← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Bartuccio-Pereira Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-03-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Rockland Nationals CCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Pickering Panthers OJHL 18 0 3 3 0.167 0.0409 0.0369 0.1141 0.1030
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Southern Maine D3 NEHC GR 16 3 3 6 0.375
2020-21 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 16 0 4 4 0.250
2019-20 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast JR 16 0 4 4 0.250
2018-19 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 19 0 4 4 0.210
2018-19 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SO 19 0 4 4 0.210
2017-18 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 13 0 4 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2017-18 · Southern Maine
+784.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25991
Defenseman overall
#2815
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2005-06
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Babson · 2024-25
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.