IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Christ Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 — BCHL 41 2 4 6 0.146 0.0564 0.0569 0.2132 0.2152
2008-09 Surrey Eagles BCHL 42 3 4 7 0.167 0.0642 0.0621 0.2429 0.2349
2009-10 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 54 10 9 19 0.352 0.1250 0.1161 0.3695 0.3431
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Fredonia D3 — SR 19 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Fredonia D3 — SO 13 4 3 7 0.538
2010-11 Fredonia D3 — FR 27 5 3 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2010-11 · Fredonia
+266.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#47585
Forward overall
#1586
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bochert
SUNY Morrisville · 2015-16
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Kirby
Elmira · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
P.J. Conlon
Amherst · 2015-16
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.