IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Harmon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Elite 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 38 2 6 8 0.210 0.0252 0.0245 0.0483 0.0471
2016-17 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 44 25 32 57 1.296 0.1553 0.1424 0.2974 0.2726
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 New England D3 — SO 5 1 0 1 0.200
2017-18 New England D3 — FR 20 2 1 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2017-18 · New England
+84.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37718
Forward overall
#1715
Forward born in 1996
#238
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew McCann
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Dronen
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2023-24
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew MacKenzie
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.