IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Visnick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 41 11 19 30 0.732 0.1690 0.1721 0.3580 0.3645
2016-17 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 47 17 32 49 1.043 0.2408 0.2343 0.5101 0.4963
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Brockport D1 — JR 15 1 1 2 0.133
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 15 1 1 2 0.133
2018-19 Brockport D1 — SO 26 2 5 7 0.269
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 26 2 5 7 0.269
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 21 2 1 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2017-18 · SUNY Brockport
-20.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14430
Forward overall
#575
Forward born in 1996
#216
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Greg Diamond
SUNY Geneseo · 2024-25
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Hogg
Concordia · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Arthur Gordon
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.