IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Lepitre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-02 Country: Canada
Castleton
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Niverville Nighthawks MJHL 40 6 5 11 0.275 0.0529 0.0544 0.1734 0.1782
2024-25 — MJHL 43 13 17 30 0.698 0.1343 0.1306 0.4400 0.4280
2025-26 Idaho Falls Spud Kings NCDC 50 14 33 47 0.940 0.3832 0.3612 0.7556 0.7122
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12941
Forward overall
#635
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

Castleton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Glenn Wiswell
0.67
actual FR PPG at Castleton
Ryan Frost
0.75
actual FR PPG at Castleton
Steve Culbertson
1.11
actual FR PPG at Castleton
Asa Palker
0.46
actual FR PPG at Castleton

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gattelaro
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hayes
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.