IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Murphy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 3 11 14 0.368 0.1034 0.1029 0.3030 0.3016
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Colby D3 NESCAC SR 4 0 2 2 0.500
2019-20 Colby D3 NESCAC JR 24 4 4 8 0.333
2018-19 Colby D3 NESCAC SO 25 1 4 5 0.200
2017-18 Colby D3 NESCAC FR 5 0 3 3 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2017-18 · Colby
+581.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46135
Forward overall
#2304
Forward born in 1997
#218
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Lappin
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Magill-Diaz
Trine · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Woolley
Salem State · 2017-18
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.