← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin O'Neill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 2 2 4 0.091 0.0273 0.0292 0.0749 0.0800
2015-16 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 33 4 4 8 0.242 0.0728 0.0742 0.1997 0.2035
2016-17 Connecticut Nighthawks EHL 47 10 15 25 0.532 0.1141 0.1106 0.2605 0.2526
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 2 1 0 1 0.500
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 10 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 8 0 2 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2017-18 · Suffolk
+204.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43021
Forward overall
#1990
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.