← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin O'Neill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 2 2 4 0.091 0.0255 0.0272 0.0747 0.0798
2015-16 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 33 4 4 8 0.242 0.0680 0.0693 0.1993 0.2031
2016-17 Connecticut Nighthawks EHL 47 10 15 25 0.532 0.1229 0.1192 0.2603 0.2524
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Suffolk D1 CNE SR 2 1 0 1 0.500
2020-21 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 2 1 0 1 0.500
2019-20 Suffolk D1 CNE JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Suffolk D1 CNE SO 10 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 10 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 8 0 2 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2017-18 · Suffolk
+194.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44373
Forward overall
#1997
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.