IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchell Spring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 46 3 5 8 0.174 0.0426 0.0425 0.1197 0.1195
2016-17 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 6 20 26 0.578 0.1622 0.1620 0.4751 0.4744
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hobart D1 SUNYAC JR 19 0 6 6 0.316
2019-20 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 19 0 6 6 0.316
2018-19 Hobart D1 SUNYAC SO 12 0 1 1 0.083
2018-19 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 12 0 1 1 0.083
2017-18 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 9 0 2 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2017-18 · Hobart
+106.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14649
Defenseman overall
#2142
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Widing
Hamline · 2010-11
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Crowe
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Derrick Budz
Aurora · 2018-19
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.