IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Crowe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 57 17 17 34 0.597 0.2215 0.2162 0.6316 0.6164
2010-11 — NAHL 54 13 18 31 0.574 0.2132 0.1972 0.6079 0.5623
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 23 6 4 10 0.435
2013-14 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 16 4 2 6 0.375
2012-13 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 27 10 11 21 0.778
2011-12 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 29 12 11 23 0.793
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2011-12 · Wentworth
+352.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18195
Forward overall
#760
Forward born in 1990
#1581
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Luiten
Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carson Kelley
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Cass
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.