IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landon Hasenfuss Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Elite 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Northeast Generals NA3HL 7 5 2 7 1.000 0.1255 0.1247 0.3157 0.3137
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC GR 25 0 4 4 0.160
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salem State D1 MASCAC JR 26 3 2 5 0.192
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 26 3 2 5 0.192
2018-19 Salem State D1 MASCAC SO 25 1 3 4 0.160
2018-19 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 25 1 3 4 0.160
2017-18 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 24 1 0 1 0.042
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2017-18 · Salem State
-60.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Greg Diamond
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Edgar
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Walker
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.