IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Shanley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 35 6 10 16 0.457 0.0669 0.0686 0.2241 0.2298
2016-17 Northern Cyclones EHL 44 10 9 19 0.432 0.0632 0.0619 0.2117 0.2075
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Nazareth D1 — SR 11 1 1 2 0.182
2020-21 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 11 1 1 2 0.182
2019-20 Nazareth D1 — JR 25 1 5 6 0.240
2019-20 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 25 1 5 6 0.240
2018-19 Nazareth D1 — SO 21 0 3 3 0.143
2018-19 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 21 0 3 3 0.143
2017-18 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 15 0 1 1 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2017-18 · Nazareth
+20.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35538
Forward overall
#1521
Forward born in 1996
#1320
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Lieth
SUNY Potsdam · 2018-19
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Phee
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Brodeen
Bethel · 2006-07
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.