IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Axel Olson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-30 Country: Switzerland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Mid Cities Jr. Stars NA3HL 28 0 4 4 0.143 0.0182 0.0187 0.0452 0.0465
2015-16 Mid Cities Jr. Stars NA3HL 40 2 5 7 0.175 0.0223 0.0219 0.0554 0.0543
2016-17 Mid Cities Jr. Stars NA3HL 45 3 16 19 0.422 0.0538 0.0501 0.1335 0.1242
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#23383
Defenseman overall
#2656
Defenseman born in 1996
#3906
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevie Ray Adams
SUNY Morrisville · 2013-14
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Cihak
Hamline · 2010-11
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Giovanni Perillo
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.