IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Miller Rubin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Palm Beach Hawks USPHL-Elite 33 10 12 22 0.667 0.0615 0.0655 0.1527 0.1628
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 24 0 3 3 0.125 0.0351 0.0363 0.1028 0.1064
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Suffolk D1 CNE SR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2020-21 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2019-20 Suffolk D1 CNE JR 13 1 9 10 0.769
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 13 1 9 10 0.769
2018-19 Suffolk D1 CNE SO 20 2 5 7 0.350
2018-19 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 20 2 5 7 0.350
2017-18 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#22478
Defenseman overall
#2798
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Williamson
Concordia · 2010-11
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Charles
Middlebury · 2011-12
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Burton
Marian · 2007-08
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.