IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Burton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-12-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 46 4 5 9 0.196 0.0279 0.0296 0.0812 0.0861
2007-08 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 44 7 19 26 0.591 0.0841 0.0843 0.2452 0.2459
2008-09 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 47 9 31 40 0.851 0.1212 0.1153 0.3531 0.3359
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 3 15 18 0.667
2012-13 Marian D3 NCHA JR 26 0 6 6 0.231
2011-12 Marian D3 NCHA SO 26 5 12 17 0.654
2010-11 Marian D3 NCHA FR 17 1 2 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2010-11 · Marian
+81.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10891
Defenseman overall
#1242
Defenseman born in 1988
#610
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stefan Seel
Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Murray
Castleton · 2009-10
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Melkert
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.