IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Charles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-12-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — BCHL 46 2 9 11 0.239 0.0921 0.0971 0.3480 0.3669
2011-12 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 49 19 28 47 0.959 0.3696 0.3693 1.3959 1.3949
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 23 7 5 12 0.522
2014-15 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 24 10 10 20 0.833
2013-14 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 15 6 11 17 1.133
2012-13 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2012-13 · Middlebury
-50.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21838
Forward overall
#804
Forward born in 1992
#1102
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Duane
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Blanchard
King's · 2018-19
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2011-12
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Billings
Salve Regina · 2014-15
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.