← New Search ↗ Social Card

Billy McGwin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1404 0.1523 0.4118 0.4468
2016-17 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 46 2 10 12 0.261 0.0784 0.0777 0.1786 0.1770
2017-18 Rochester Monarchs NCDC 50 2 11 13 0.260 0.1450 0.1410 0.2102 0.2045
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 25 3 7 10 0.400
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salem State D1 SO 26 7 8 15 0.577
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 26 7 8 15 0.577
2018-19 Salem State D1 FR 28 8 8 16 0.571
2018-19 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 28 8 8 16 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2018-19 · Salem State
+477.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
5%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42973
Forward overall
#2126
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.