← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Manning Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-06-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Connecticut Nighthawks EHL 21 1 2 3 0.143 0.0330 0.0333 0.0699 0.0706
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 49 19 23 42 0.857 0.1980 0.1891 0.4194 0.4005
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SR 20 4 9 13 0.650
2020-21 Anna Maria D1 MASCAC JR 6 1 2 3 0.500
2020-21 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC JR 7 1 2 3 0.429
2019-20 Anna Maria D1 MASCAC SO 25 5 11 16 0.640
2019-20 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SO 25 5 11 16 0.640
2018-19 Anna Maria D1 MASCAC FR 24 5 6 11 0.458
2018-19 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC FR 24 5 6 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2018-19 · Anna Maria
+282.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8774
Defenseman overall
#1546
Defenseman born in 1997
#1120
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.