| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Connecticut Nighthawks | EHL | 21 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.143 | 0.0503 | 0.0508 | 0.0701 | 0.0708 |
| 2017-18 | Vermont Lumberjacks | EHL | 49 | 19 | 23 | 42 | 0.857 | 0.3016 | 0.2880 | 0.4202 | 0.4013 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Anna Maria | D3 | MASCAC | SR | 20 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.650 |
| 2020-21 | Anna Maria | D1 | — | JR | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.500 |
| 2020-21 | Anna Maria | D3 | MASCAC | JR | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.429 |
| 2019-20 | Anna Maria | D1 | — | SO | 25 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 0.640 |
| 2019-20 | Anna Maria | D3 | MASCAC | SO | 25 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 0.640 |
| 2018-19 | Anna Maria | D1 | — | FR | 24 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.458 |
| 2018-19 | Anna Maria | D3 | MASCAC | FR | 24 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.458 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.