IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Nikolopoulos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 42 10 7 17 0.405 0.0869 0.0867 0.1982 0.1977
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 GR 33 8 3 11 0.333
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 22 1 5 6 0.273
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 32 11 9 20 0.625
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 22 7 3 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2018-19 · Franklin Pierce
+512.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41460
Forward overall
#1936
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Luhmann
Endicott · 2016-17
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Badham
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Meeh
Saint Mary's · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.