← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Nikolopoulos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 3 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 42 10 7 17 0.405 0.0935 0.0933 0.1981 0.1976
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 GR 33 8 3 11 0.333
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 22 1 5 6 0.273
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 JR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 SO 32 11 9 20 0.625
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 32 11 9 20 0.625
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 FR 22 7 3 10 0.455
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 22 7 3 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2018-19 · Franklin Pierce
+468.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38416
Forward overall
#1986
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2016-17
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Albertus Magnus · 2021-22
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.