← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Meeh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 44 13 23 36 0.818 0.1027 0.1091
2013-14 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 20 0 3 3 0.150 0.0551 0.0570 0.1583 0.1637
2014-15 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 60 5 16 21 0.350 0.1286 0.1263 0.3694 0.3627
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 60 7 17 24 0.400 0.1470 0.1378 0.4222 0.3959
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC SR 22 13 9 22 1.000
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 22 13 9 22 1.000
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC JR 27 7 8 15 0.556
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 27 7 8 15 0.556
2017-18 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 25 8 8 16 0.640
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 25 3 11 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2016-17 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+345.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12776
Defenseman overall
#1699
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.