IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kalle Sundell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-30 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 49 7 14 21 0.429 0.1747 0.1646 0.3445 0.3245
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE SR 25 5 13 18 0.720
2020-21 Curry D1 CNE JR 5 1 2 3 0.600
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE JR 5 1 2 3 0.600
2019-20 Curry D1 CNE SO 19 2 4 6 0.316
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE SO 19 2 4 6 0.316
2018-19 Curry D1 CNE FR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2018-19 Curry D3 CNE FR 26 3 7 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2018-19 · Curry
+147.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4173
Defenseman overall
#898
Defenseman born in 1997
#680
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Miller
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Blomquist
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Fischer
Misericordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.