IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Pray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Express Hockey Club EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Express Hockey Club EHL 48 22 18 40 0.833 0.1925 0.1906 0.4077 0.4036
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SR 27 7 6 13 0.481
2019-20 Brockport D1 — SO 11 3 1 4 0.364
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 11 3 1 4 0.364
2018-19 Brockport D1 — FR 18 5 3 8 0.444
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 18 5 3 8 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2018-19 · Brockport
+172.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
62%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18654
Forward overall
#885
Forward born in 1998
#363
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Grealish
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Benkovitz
Arcadia · 2023-24
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kobler
Connecticut College · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.