IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Kobler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-24 Country: Switzerland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 16 0 2 2 0.125 0.0510 0.0527 0.1005 0.1038
2018-19 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 40 10 10 20 0.500 0.0654 0.0634 0.1697 0.1645
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC — 5 2 2 4 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2020-21 · Connecticut College
+1481.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36421
Forward overall
#1987
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Benkovitz
Arcadia · 2023-24
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Williams
Norwich · 2017-18
0.345 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vito Aluia
Lake Forest · 2013-14
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.