| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Port Huron Fighting Falcons | NAHL | 52 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 0.385 | 0.1524 | 0.1565 | 0.4038 | 0.4146 |
| 2013-14 | Port Huron Fighting Falcons | NAHL | 58 | 13 | 20 | 33 | 0.569 | 0.2254 | 0.2201 | 0.5974 | 0.5835 |
| 2014-15 | Keystone Ice Miners | NAHL | 54 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 0.296 | 0.1174 | 0.1085 | 0.3111 | 0.2875 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Lake Forest | D1 | — | SR | 8 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.250 |
| 2018-19 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | SR | 8 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.250 |
| 2017-18 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | JR | 15 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.267 |
| 2016-17 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | SO | 21 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.333 |
| 2015-16 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | FR | 24 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 0.292 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.