IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isac Martins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 17 1 0 1 0.059 0.0136 0.0141 0.0475 0.0494
2023-24 Northern Cyclones NCDC 32 5 7 12 0.375 0.0867 0.0852 0.3032 0.2980
2024-25 Northern Cyclones NCDC 51 13 13 26 0.510 0.1178 0.1105 0.4122 0.3867
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 21 4 8 12 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2025-26 · Saint Anselm
+565.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27634
Forward overall
#1602
Forward born in 2004
#921
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Witman
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Romasco
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Whited
Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.