IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Damon Bossie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Thunder Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 44 5 9 14 0.318 0.0359 0.0384 0.1083 0.1160
2022-23 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 21 0 6 6 0.286 0.0660 0.0684 0.2310 0.2394
2023-24 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 57 7 18 25 0.439 0.1558 0.1535 0.4605 0.4536
2024-25 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 53 9 29 38 0.717 0.2547 0.2375 0.7528 0.7020
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England D3 — — 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4072
Defenseman overall
#1069
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marc Biggs
Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.