← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jarrad Vroman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 59 5 16 21 0.356 0.0772 0.0752 0.2754 0.2682
2017-18 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 62 9 16 25 0.403 0.0875 0.0807 0.3120 0.2877
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SR 27 1 7 8 0.296
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen JR 8 0 3 3 0.375
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 8 0 3 3 0.375
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen SO 28 5 9 14 0.500
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 28 5 9 14 0.500
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC 25 2 6 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2018-19 · Stevenson
+331.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13890
Defenseman overall
#2060
Defenseman born in 1997
#1174
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2001-02
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.