IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Flannery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Metro Jets NA3HL 36 4 14 18 0.500 0.0602 0.0616 0.1580 0.1618
2016-17 Metro Jets NA3HL 43 13 24 37 0.861 0.1037 0.1009 0.2718 0.2646
2017-18 Metro Jets NA3HL 45 14 33 47 1.044 0.1259 0.1162 0.3299 0.3044
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 19 2 0 2 0.105
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 22 2 5 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2018-19 · SUNY Brockport
+206.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11772
Defenseman overall
#1730
Defenseman born in 1997
#1087
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Clayton Chessa
Concordia Wisconsin · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Englebright
Nichols · 2007-08
0.483 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Heisinger
Curry · 2012-13
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.