IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tom Terranova Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 37 6 7 13 0.351 0.0986 0.1002 0.2889 0.2935
2017-18 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 45 9 17 26 0.578 0.2356 0.2243 0.4644 0.4422
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 22 7 4 11 0.500
2019-20 Potsdam D1 — SO 27 4 12 16 0.593
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 27 4 12 16 0.593
2018-19 Potsdam D1 — FR 23 2 4 6 0.261
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 23 2 4 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2018-19 · Potsdam
+74.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21638
Forward overall
#990
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Crouse
Bethel · 2008-09
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn O'Malley
Aurora · 2017-18
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Turner
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.