IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-01-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Bramalea Blues OJHL 42 18 31 49 1.167 0.2860 0.2900 0.8033 0.8145
2001-02 Bramalea Blues OJHL 37 24 26 50 1.351 0.3312 0.3187 0.9304 0.8953
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 17 7 5 12 0.706
2004-05 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 33 12 20 32 0.970
2003-04 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 40 10 24 34 0.850
2002-03 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 36 10 12 22 0.611
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2002-03 · UMass Lowell
+132.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10164
Forward overall
#372
Forward born in 1983
#176
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Duane
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Penner
Concordia · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Simon Boyko
Aurora · 2017-18
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Bottrell
Adrian · 2015-16
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.