IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrei Buchko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Peoria Mustangs NA3HL 46 7 16 23 0.500 0.0628 0.0679 0.1578 0.1705
2015-16 Peoria Mustangs NA3HL 47 23 44 67 1.425 0.1789 0.1846 0.4500 0.4644
2016-17 Peoria Mustangs NA3HL 45 24 25 49 1.089 0.1367 0.1342 0.3438 0.3374
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC — 24 1 1 2 0.083
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 1 4 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2018-19 · Concordia
+51.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22167
Forward overall
#1017
Forward born in 1997
#526
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Cavalieri
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Stuermer
Marian · 2010-11
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Blitz
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.