IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Perry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHLP 40 17 17 34 0.850 0.0553 0.0529 0.1914 0.1831
2016-17 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 44 8 8 16 0.364 0.0532 0.0508 0.1783 0.1704
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Becker D3 — SO 11 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Becker D3 — FR 21 3 1 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2018-19 · Becker
+331.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38139
Forward overall
#1662
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ricardo Yesue
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathaniel Bannister
Adrian · 2024-25
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Overton
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.