IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shawn Overton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-04-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Penticton Vees BCHL 53 2 10 12 0.226 0.0872 0.0972 0.3293 0.3672
2003-04 — BCHL 61 9 15 24 0.393 0.1516 0.1623 0.5722 0.6126
2004-05 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 53 12 18 30 0.566 0.2181 0.2233 0.8232 0.8430
2005-06 — BCHL 57 11 23 34 0.597 0.2298 0.2238 0.8675 0.8449
2006-07 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 60 20 24 44 0.733 0.2825 0.2600 1.0665 0.9814
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 26 1 5 6 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2007-08 · St. Norbert
+9.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22680
Forward overall
#752
Forward born in 1986
#1176
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Coyle
Castleton · 2024-25
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Francis Rose
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.