← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.J. Layton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 26 2 9 11 0.423 0.1188 0.1237 0.3478 0.3620
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 4 10 14 0.368 0.1034 0.1026 0.3029 0.3005
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 43 9 20 29 0.674 0.2750 0.2554 0.5397 0.5012
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Salve Regina D1 CNE SO 8 2 2 4 0.500
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 8 2 2 4 0.500
2018-19 Salve Regina D1 CNE FR 18 1 3 4 0.222
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 18 1 3 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2018-19 · Salve Regina
+21.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4810
Defenseman overall
#1032
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2013-14
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.