← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael DiSchiavi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 53 1 14 15 0.283 0.0694 0.0696 0.1937 0.1942
2016-17 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 18 1 4 5 0.278 0.0681 0.0652 0.1902 0.1822
2017-18 OJHL 21 2 5 7 0.333 0.0817 0.0743 0.2281 0.2075
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Nazareth D3 UCHC 24 1 14 15 0.625
2021-22 King's D3 MAC SR 20 3 10 13 0.650
2020-21 King's D3 MAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 King's D1 SO 24 4 10 14 0.583
2019-20 King's D3 MAC SO 24 4 10 14 0.583
2018-19 King's D1 FR 21 0 4 4 0.191
2018-19 King's D3 MAC FR 21 0 4 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2018-19 · King's
+214.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#48456
Forward overall
#2457
Forward born in 1997
#3610
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.