IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Platt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 28 3 1 4 0.143 0.0209 0.0207 0.0701 0.0693
2014-15 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 44 15 8 23 0.523 0.0765 0.0721 0.2563 0.2415
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 3 1 0 1 0.333
2017-18 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#40645
Forward overall
#1626
Forward born in 1994
#1663
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Malcarney
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Ramm
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Chapman
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.