IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Lovier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1982-07-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 46 14 18 32 0.696 0.1705 0.1683 0.4790 0.4728
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 27 0 2 2 0.074
2003-04 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 26 1 3 4 0.154
2002-03 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 27 0 3 3 0.111
2001-02 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#6383
Defenseman overall
#724
Defenseman born in 1982
#1309
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Ciampichini
Elmira · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence Cornellier
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Gibbs
Endicott · 2022-23
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.