IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Collin Gamrat Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Metro Jets NA3HL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0251 0.0262 0.0631 0.0658
2016-17 Metro Jets NA3HL 15 2 3 5 0.333 0.0418 0.0415 0.1052 0.1044
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Finlandia D1 — FR 23 1 2 3 0.130
2018-19 Finlandia D3 — FR 23 1 2 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2018-19 · Finlandia
+290.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21028
Defenseman overall
#2675
Defenseman born in 1997
#3502
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tio D'Addario
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Paiement
St. Scholastica · 2010-11
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Rozsival
Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.