IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Foster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-08-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 16 2 0 2 0.125 0.0737 0.0720 0.3742 0.3654
2004-05 Springfield Spirit NAHL 18 1 4 5 0.278 0.0987 0.0927 0.2930 0.2751
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 15 0 2 2 0.133
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 23 4 3 7 0.304
2006-07 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 17 1 0 1 0.059
2005-06 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 24 4 2 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+245.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44196
Forward overall
#1270
Forward born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Hall
St. Thomas · 2003-04
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Smith
Castleton · 2013-14
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Zins
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.