IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Zins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Mason City Toros NA3HL 21 6 6 12 0.571 0.0689 0.0681 0.1805 0.1783
2014-15 Mason City Toros NA3HL 43 18 26 44 1.023 0.1233 0.1158 0.3233 0.3035
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 25 2 5 7 0.280
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 17 5 5 10 0.588
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 18 2 1 3 0.167
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 26 3 4 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Stout
+225.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37882
Forward overall
#1570
Forward born in 1994
#1159
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Renaud
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Lang
Saint Anselm · 2025-26
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Vinson
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.