← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Goupille Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Northern Cyclones EHL 47 4 7 11 0.234 0.0823 0.0823 0.1147 0.1148
2017-18 Burlington Cougars OJHL 7 2 0 2 0.286 0.0858 0.0779 0.1956 0.1776
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SR 21 2 3 5 0.238
2020-21 Anna Maria D1 JR 6 0 2 2 0.333
2020-21 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC JR 6 0 2 2 0.333
2019-20 Anna Maria D1 SO 25 0 2 2 0.080
2019-20 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SO 25 0 2 2 0.080
2018-19 Anna Maria D1 FR 24 1 2 3 0.125
2018-19 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC FR 24 1 2 3 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2018-19 · Anna Maria
+66.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14859
Defenseman overall
#2158
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2000-01
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.