IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marko Bohatiuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 New Jersey Rockets EHL 19 3 2 5 0.263 0.0608 0.0633 0.1288 0.1341
2017-18 — USPHL-Premier 22 12 7 19 0.864 0.1130 0.1094 0.2931 0.2838
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Western New England D3 CNE — 26 4 5 9 0.346
2019-20 Western New England D3 CNE — 14 1 1 2 0.143
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE — 10 2 0 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2018-19 · Western New England
+156.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29231
Forward overall
#1438
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nathan Trull
Anna Maria · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Stewart
SUNY Potsdam · 2000-01
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wiggle Kerbrat
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.