IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Prsa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-06-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 49 8 17 25 0.510 0.1251 0.1292 0.3513 0.3629
2001-02 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 46 4 23 27 0.587 0.1439 0.1412 0.4041 0.3966
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 26 3 9 12 0.462
2004-05 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 27 8 12 20 0.741
2003-04 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 29 2 11 13 0.448
2002-03 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 20 8 14 22 1.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.10
2002-03 · Wentworth
+754.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9272
Defenseman overall
#944
Defenseman born in 1983
#1927
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Charlie Page
Stonehill · 2017-18
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Van Dyk
Castleton · 2008-09
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Lloyd
Elmira · 2013-14
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.