IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Stoya Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 43 1 6 7 0.163 0.0376 0.0378 0.0797 0.0800
2017-18 Collingwood Blues OJHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 19 1 0 1 0.053
2020-21 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salem State D1 MASCAC SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Salem State D1 MASCAC FR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#21419
Defenseman overall
#2705
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Pelletier
Suffolk · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Arthur Mirante
Connecticut College · 2023-24
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Durajlija
Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.