IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Garlasco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Nepean Raiders CCHL 62 5 25 30 0.484 0.1050 0.1083 0.3746 0.3863
2016-17 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 62 8 25 33 0.532 0.1155 0.1130 0.4121 0.4033
2017-18 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 61 6 18 24 0.393 0.0853 0.0791 0.3045 0.2823
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 19 2 3 5 0.263
2020-21 Babson D1 — JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Babson D1 — SO 10 0 2 2 0.200
2019-20 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 10 0 2 2 0.200
2018-19 Babson D1 — FR 12 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37253
Forward overall
#1808
Forward born in 1997
#943
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Blake
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bunka
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Hughes
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.