IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Edwards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 WB/Scranton Knights EHL 47 1 3 4 0.085 0.0125 0.0131 0.0417 0.0437
2018-19 WB/Scranton Knights EHL 42 5 7 12 0.286 0.0418 0.0417 0.1401 0.1398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 King's D3 MAC SR 22 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 King's D3 MAC JR 19 2 5 7 0.368
2020-21 King's D3 MAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 King's D1 — FR 24 1 7 8 0.333
2019-20 King's D3 MAC FR 24 1 7 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2019-20 · King's
+1065.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21891
Defenseman overall
#3191
Defenseman born in 1999
#2583
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Owen Norman
Marian · 2023-24
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Overton
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Brodersen
St. John's · 2006-07
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.