IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gene Bouthiette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 44 45 31 76 1.727 0.2259 0.2221 0.5862 0.5764
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 26 4 14 18 0.692
2021-22 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 24 5 10 15 0.625
2019-20 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC FR 25 4 3 7 0.280
2019-20 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 25 4 3 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2019-20 · Fitchburg State
+47.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4453
Forward overall
#182
Forward born in 1999
#72
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Serba
Norwich · 2000-01
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Stevens
Southern Maine · 2004-05
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Perez
New England College · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.