← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Perez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Elite 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 38 4 18 22 0.579 0.0431 0.0431 0.1326 0.1326
2021-22 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 27 15 24 39 1.444 0.1076 0.1018 0.3309 0.3129
2022-23 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 39 7 23 30 0.769 0.0868 0.0817 0.2617 0.2462
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wilkes D3 MAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Wilkes D3 MAC 20 1 4 5 0.250
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast 25 2 8 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2023-24 · New England College
+372.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5617
Defenseman overall
#1417
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Castleton · 2009-10
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.