| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Kenai River Brown Bears | NAHL | 48 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 0.208 | 0.0773 | 0.0844 | 0.2205 | 0.2406 |
| 2010-11 | Langley Rivermen | BCHL | 59 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 0.407 | 0.1583 | 0.1628 | 0.5932 | 0.6101 |
| 2011-12 | Amarillo Wranglers | NAHL | 50 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 0.380 | 0.1411 | 0.1398 | 0.4023 | 0.3987 |
| 2012-13 | Amarillo Wranglers | NAHL | 57 | 7 | 21 | 28 | 0.491 | 0.1824 | 0.1716 | 0.5201 | 0.4893 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | SR | 29 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.345 |
| 2015-16 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | JR | 31 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.387 |
| 2014-15 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | SO | 31 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.355 |
| 2013-14 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | FR | 14 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.