← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trace Strahle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 48 8 2 10 0.208 0.0773 0.0844 0.2205 0.2406
2010-11 Langley Rivermen BCHL 59 8 16 24 0.407 0.1583 0.1628 0.5932 0.6101
2011-12 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 50 5 14 19 0.380 0.1411 0.1398 0.4023 0.3987
2012-13 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 57 7 21 28 0.491 0.1824 0.1716 0.5201 0.4893
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 29 3 7 10 0.345
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 31 2 10 12 0.387
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 31 2 9 11 0.355
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 14 2 5 7 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+233.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6122
Defenseman overall
#1103
Defenseman born in 1992
#2791
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2004-05
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.