IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Rand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — NCDC 30 0 8 8 0.267 0.1487 0.1461 0.2157 0.2119
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 25 4 4 8 0.320
2021-22 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2020-21 Suffolk D1 — SO 2 1 0 1 0.500
2020-21 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 2 1 0 1 0.500
2019-20 Suffolk D1 — FR 23 2 4 6 0.261
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 23 2 4 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2019-20 · Suffolk
+108.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29229
Forward overall
#1537
Forward born in 1999
#982
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Star
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devon Schell
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dillon Steh
Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.