IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Rand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — NCDC 30 0 8 8 0.267 0.1087 0.1068 0.2144 0.2106
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 25 4 4 8 0.320
2021-22 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2020-21 Suffolk D1 CNE SO 2 1 0 1 0.500
2020-21 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 2 1 0 1 0.500
2019-20 Suffolk D1 CNE FR 23 2 4 6 0.261
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 23 2 4 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2019-20 · Suffolk
+185.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28272
Forward overall
#1482
Forward born in 1999
#1020
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Star
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dillon Steh
Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Smart
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.