IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graham Denomme Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Nepean Raiders CCHL 61 5 14 19 0.311 0.0889 0.0872 0.2411 0.2366
2018-19 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 55 13 17 30 0.545 0.1557 0.1459 0.4223 0.3957
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 25 2 7 9 0.360
2021-22 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 26 2 6 8 0.308
2020-21 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 15 1 5 6 0.400
2019-20 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 22 3 2 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2019-20 · Elmira
+116.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31828
Forward overall
#1363
Forward born in 1998
#1164
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kurt Weston
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Ausmus
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Dovey
Adrian · 2008-09
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.